Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD C 50

AMD C 50

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 2500+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 2500+

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1.75 GHz vs 1 GHz 75% higher clock speed
Front view of AMD C 50

Reasons to consider the
AMD C 50

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 32,500 MB/s vs 38.7 MB/s More than 839.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.25 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 7.31W vs 47.94W 6.6x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Jul, 2004 Release date over 6 years later
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 69 °C More than 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
Better performance per watt 3.24 pt/W vs 0.41 pt/W More than 7.8x better performance per watt
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.17 $/year vs 14.21 $/year 6.6x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 7.88 $/year vs 51.68 $/year 6.6x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 2500+ vs C 50

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Sempron 2500+
38.7 MB/s
AMD C 50
32,500 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 2500+  vs
C 50 
Clock speed 1.75 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3

details

Sempron 2500+  vs
C 50 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 69°C Unknown - 90°C

power consumption

TDP 59W 9W
Annual home energy cost 14.21 $/year 2.17 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 51.68 $/year 7.88 $/year
Performance per watt 0.41 pt/W 3.24 pt/W
Typical power consumption 47.94W 7.31W
AMD Sempron 2500+
Report a correction
AMD C 50
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus