Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 210U

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 210U

Report a correction
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Front view of AMD G G-T48E

Reasons to consider the
AMD G G-T48E

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Jun, 2012 vs Jan, 2009 Release date over 3 years later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 210U vs G G-T48E

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 210U  vs
G G-T48E 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Sempron 210U  vs
G G-T48E 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.8 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz 1.4 GHz

power consumption

TDP 15W 18W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 1.5 pt/W 2.05 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 14.63W
AMD Sempron 210U
Report a correction
AMD G G-T48E
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus