CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 210U vs 350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

E 350
n.d.
Atom D525
n.d.
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6.2

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Sempron 210U 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Sempron 210U  based on its single-core performance and power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Sempron 210U

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD Sempron 210U

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 210U

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 210U

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 30.2W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 12 $/year 3.3x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 28.21 $/year 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 51,600 MB/s vs 29.7 MB/s More than 1737.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz Around 95% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,096 vs 456.5 Around 2.5x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Jan, 2009 Release date over 1 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 210U vs E 350

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Sempron 210U
456.5
E 350
1,096

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Sempron 210U
462.5
E 350
620

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Sempron 210U
29.7 MB/s
E 350
51,600 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 210U  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 15W 18W
Annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year 28.21 $/year
Performance per watt 1.5 pt/W 1.5 pt/W
Typical power consumption 12.19W 30.2W

details

Sempron 210U  vs
E 350 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.25 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.8 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.5 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.8 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 492 MHz
AMD Sempron 210U
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus