Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 210U

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 210U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Front view of AMD Athlon XP 2000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 2000+

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 1.67 GHz vs 1.5 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Sempron 210U  vs Athlon XP 2000+ 

clock speed

Sempron 210U
1.5 GHz
Athlon XP 2000+
1.67 GHz

L2 cache

Sempron 210U
0.25 MB
Athlon XP 2000+
0.25 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 210U  vs
Athlon XP 2000+ 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.67 GHz
Cores Single core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Sempron 210U  vs
Athlon XP 2000+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.25 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 12.19W N/A
AMD Sempron 210U
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP 2000+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus