Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 200U

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 200U

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Newer Jan, 2009 vs May, 2004 Release date over 4 years later
Front view of AMD Geode NX 1500

Reasons to consider the
AMD Geode NX 1500

Report a correction
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.74 GHz vs 1 GHz Around 75% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Features Key features of the Sempron 200U  vs Geode NX 1500 

clock speed

L2 cache

Sempron 200U
0.25 MB
Geode NX 1500
0.25 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Sempron 200U
1 GHz
Geode NX 1500
1.74 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 200U  vs
Geode NX 1500 
Clock speed 1 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Single core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Sempron 200U  vs
Geode NX 1500 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.25 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.25 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1 GHz 1.74 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1 GHz 1.74 GHz

power consumption

TDP 8W 9W
Annual home energy cost 1.93 $/year 2.17 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 7.01 $/year 7.88 $/year
Typical power consumption 6.5W 7.31W
AMD Sempron 200U
Report a correction
AMD Geode NX 1500
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus