Winner
AMD Sempron 145
CPUBoss recommends the AMD Sempron 145 based on its .
See full details AMD Sempron 145 vs 140 |
Released May, 2010
AMD Sempron 145
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
6.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 145
 | Much better performance per dollar 18.9 pt/$ | | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.06 GHz |
| | Newer May, 2010 | | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.46 GHz |
by darkapollo (Jan, 2013)Im a budget builder, so I just could not pass up the chance to get a cheap CPU that was easily unlocked and overclocked.
VS
Released July, 2009
AMD Sempron 140
- 2.7 GHz
- Single core
6.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the 140
| | Much more l3 cache per core 1 MB/core | | More l3 cache 1 MB |
by kairi_zeroblade (Dec, 2011)well of course don't expect it to be a chip that can even match the Athlon 2 series.
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 145 vs 140
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Passmark and GeekBench (32-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Passmark (Single Core) | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Passmark (Overclocked), Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
AMD Sempron 145CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better performance per dollar | 18.9 pt/$ | vs | 7.16 pt/$ | Around 2.8x better performance per dollar | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.06 GHz | vs | 3.67 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Newer | May, 2010 | vs | Jul, 2009 | Release date 9 months later | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.46 GHz | vs | 3.83 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0 MB/core | Compared to all cpus, 1 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK | |||
| More l3 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 1 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 145 vs 140
GeekBench (32-bit)
GeekBench
Passmark
Passmark (Single Core)
Reviews Word on the street
| Sempron 145 | vs | 140 | ||
 | Sempron 145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 145 | vs | 140 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM3 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 2,000 MHz | 2,000 MHz | |
details | Sempron 145 | vs | 140 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 0 MB | 1 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nms | 45 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 0.83 - 1.35V | 0.83 - 1.35V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 63°C | Unknown - 63°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 9 | 5 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 3.67 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.46 GHz | 3.83 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,763.8 | 1,557.8 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.06 GHz | 3.67 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 45W | 45W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 4.15 pt/W | 3.97 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 36.56W | |
 AMD Sempron 145  Report a correction |  AMD Sempron 140 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $59 | $20 | |
| AMD Athlon II X2 270 vs Sempron 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $18 | $20 | |
| Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs AMD Sempron 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $45 | $20 | |
| AMD Athlon II X2 250 vs Sempron 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $29 | $20 | |
| AMD Sempron 2650 vs 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $40 | $20 | |
| AMD A4 4000 vs Sempron 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $20 | |
| AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs Sempron 145 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $36 | $28 | |
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Sempron 140 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $235 | $330 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $369 | $320 | |
| Intel Core i7 5820K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS | |
| $235 | $320 | |
| Intel Core i5 4690K vs i7 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $85 | |
| Intel Pentium N3530 vs Core i3 3110M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $235 | $170 | |
| Intel Core i5 4690K vs AMD FX 8350 | ||
