AMD Sempron 145 vs Second Generation Opteron 8218 |
Released May, 2010
AMD Sempron 145
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 145
 | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | | Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W |
| | Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz | | Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year |
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Second Generation Opteron 8218
| | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 | | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB |
| | Higher Maximum operating temperature 72 °C | | More cores 2 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 77.19W | 2.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | 2.1x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 72 °C | vs | 63 °C | Around 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Sempron 145 vs Second Generation Opteron 8218
clock speed
L2 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 145 | vs | Second Generation Opteron 8218 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM3 | |||
| F | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
details | Sempron 145 | vs | Second Generation Opteron 8218 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 1 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 90 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 8 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 63°C | 0 - 72°C | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 45W | 95W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 77.19W | |
 AMD Sempron 145  Report a correction |  AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $30 | $125 | |
| 145 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | $179 | |
| 145 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | ||
| 145 vs 270 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | ||
| 145 vs 250 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | $200 | |
| 145 vs 965 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | $205 | |
| 145 vs 2400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $30 | ||
| 145 vs 5000+ | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
