0 Comments
| AMD Sempron 145 vs Second Generation Opteron 8218 |
Released May, 2010
AMD Sempron 145
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 145
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W |
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year |
VS
First seen on January, 2013
AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Second Generation Opteron 8218
![]() | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 | ![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB |
![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 72 °C | ![]() | More cores 2 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 77.19W | 2.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | 2.1x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 72 °C | vs | 63 °C | Around 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once |
Features Key features of the Sempron 145 vs Second Generation Opteron 8218
clock speed
Sempron 145
2.8 GHz
Second Generation Opteron 8218
2.6 GHz
L2 cache
Sempron 145
1 MB
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 145 | vs | Second Generation Opteron 8218 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
AM3 | |||
F | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Sempron 145 | vs | Second Generation Opteron 8218 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 8 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 63°C | 0 - 72°C | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 45W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 77.19W |
AMD Sempron 145 ![]() | AMD Second Generation Opteron 8218 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | $125 | |
145 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | ||
145 vs 250 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | $179 | |
145 vs E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | ||
145 vs 270 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | $200 | |
145 vs 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | ||
145 vs 62 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | ||
145 vs 5000+ | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||