0 Comments
| AMD Sempron 145 vs Phenom X3 8400 |
Released May, 2010
AMD Sempron 145
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 145
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz | ![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 882 |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.05 GHz |
VS
Released March, 2008
AMD Phenom X3 8400
- 2.1 GHz
- Tri core
Reasons to buy the Phenom X3 8400
![]() | Much more l3 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB |
![]() | More cores 3 | ![]() | More threads 3 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.1 GHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 882 | vs | 714 | Around 25% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.05 GHz | vs | 2.46 GHz | Around 65% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better performance per watt | 2.06 pt/W | vs | 0.91 pt/W | More than 2.2x better performance per watt | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 77.19W | 2.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.28 GHz | vs | 2.75 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | 2.1x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | May, 2010 | vs | Mar, 2008 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 2 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 3 | vs | 1 | Three times as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 3 | vs | 1 | Three times as many threads | |||
Much better PassMark score | 1,646 | vs | 800 | More than 2x better PassMark score | |||
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,605 | vs | 1,332 | More than 95% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 0.67 MB/core | vs | 0 MB/core | Compared to all cpus, 0.67 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 70 °C | vs | 63 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 145 vs Phenom X3 8400
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 145
1,405
Phenom X3 8400
2,716
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 145
1,409
Phenom X3 8400
948
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 145
111,900 MB/s
Phenom X3 8400
79,150 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 145
1,332
Phenom X3 8400
2,605
GeekBench
Sempron 145
1,332
Phenom X3 8400
2,909
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Sempron 145
800
Phenom X3 8400
1,646
PassMark (Single Core)
Sempron 145
882
Phenom X3 8400
714
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 145 | vs | Phenom X3 8400 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Tri core | |
Socket type | |||
AM3 | |||
AM2+ | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 45W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.06 pt/W | 0.91 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 77.19W | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 2,000 MHz | 1,800 MHz |
details | Sempron 145 | vs | Phenom X3 8400 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 3 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.67 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 0 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 0.67 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 63°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.05 GHz | 2.46 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.28 GHz | 2.75 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,763.8 | 1,700.9 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.05 GHz | 2.46 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
AMD Sempron 145 ![]() | AMD Phenom X3 8400 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | ||
AMD Athlon II X2 250 vs Sempron 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $30 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD Sempron 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $30 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 vs AMD Sempron 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | ||
AMD Athlon II X2 270 vs Sempron 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $30 | |
AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs Sempron 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | ||
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Sempron 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | ||
Intel Core i3 3210 vs AMD Phenom X3 8400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||