0 Comments
| AMD Sempron 145 vs Phenom II X4 965 |
Released May, 2010
AMD Sempron 145
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 145
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 2.06 pt/W |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year |
VS
Released November, 2009
AMD Phenom II X4 965
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Phenom II X4 965
![]() | Much more l3 cache 6 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB |
![]() | Is unlocked Yes | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 152.93W | 4.2x lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better performance per watt | 2.06 pt/W | vs | 1.08 pt/W | More than 90% better performance per watt | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 54.06 $/year | 5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 152.42 $/year | 3.9x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 63 °C | vs | 62 °C | Almost the same | |||
| |||||||
Much more l3 cache | 6 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 6 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
Much higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | More than 20% higher clock speed | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more threads | |||
Much better PassMark score | 5,916 | vs | 800 | Around 7.5x better PassMark score | |||
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 5,974 | vs | 1,332 | Around 4.5x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
Much more l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 0 MB/core | Compared to all cpus, 1.5 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 145 vs Phenom II X4 965
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 145
1,405
Phenom II X4 965
6,266
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 145
1,409
Phenom II X4 965
1,774
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 145
111,900 MB/s
Phenom II X4 965
137,800 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 145
1,332
Phenom II X4 965
5,974
GeekBench
Sempron 145
1,332
Phenom II X4 965
7,939
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Sempron 145
800
Phenom II X4 965
5,916
PassMark (Single Core)
Sempron 145
882
Phenom II X4 965
1,361
Reviews Word on the street
Sempron 145 | vs | Phenom II X4 965 | ||
![]() | 7.6 | 8.8 |
---|
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 145 | vs | Phenom II X4 965 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
AM3 | |||
Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
details | Sempron 145 | vs | Phenom II X4 965 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 0 MB | 6 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 0 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 0.82 - 1.35V | 0.85 - 1.43V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 63°C | Unknown - 62°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclock popularity | 9 | 22 | |
Overclocked clock speed | 4.05 GHz | 4.05 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.28 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,763.8 | 3,136.7 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.05 GHz | 4.05 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 45W | 140W | |
Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 54.06 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 152.42 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.06 pt/W | 1.08 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 152.93W | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 2,000 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
AMD Sempron 145 ![]() | AMD Phenom II X4 965 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $200 | |
6300 vs 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
640 vs 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $200 | |
3220 vs 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $200 | |
4300 vs 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$128 | $200 | |
8350 vs 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$184 | $200 | |
3570K vs 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $30 | |
3220 vs 145 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
PandaBear (03:53 AM, July 1, 2013)