0 Comments
| AMD Sempron 145 vs Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
Released May, 2010
AMD Sempron 145
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 145
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | Much better PassMark (Single core) score 882 |
![]() | Much better performance per watt 2.06 pt/W | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz |
VS
Released December, 2006
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+
- 2.6 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Athlon 64 X2 5000+
![]() | Is unlocked Yes | ![]() | Much better PassMark score 1,497 |
![]() | More cores 2 | ![]() | More threads 2 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 882 | vs | 779 | Around 15% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Much better performance per watt | 2.06 pt/W | vs | 0.61 pt/W | More than 3.2x better performance per watt | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.05 GHz | vs | 3.13 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 72.31W | Around 50% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.28 GHz | vs | 3.39 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | Around 50% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Newer | May, 2010 | vs | Dec, 2006 | Release date over 3 years later | |||
| |||||||
Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
Much better PassMark score | 1,497 | vs | 800 | More than 85% better PassMark score | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 70 °C | vs | 63 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 145 vs Athlon 64 X2 5000+
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 145
1,405
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
1,767.5
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 145
1,409
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
994.5
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 145
111,900 MB/s
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
64.85 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 145
1,332
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
1,857
GeekBench
Sempron 145
1,332
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
3,326
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Sempron 145
800
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
1,497
PassMark (Single Core)
Sempron 145
882
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 145 | vs | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
AM3 | |||
AM2 | |||
Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes |
details | Sempron 145 | vs | Athlon 64 X2 5000+ |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 63°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.05 GHz | 3.13 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.28 GHz | 3.39 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,763.8 | 1,518.5 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.05 GHz | 3.13 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 45W | 89W | |
Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 21.44 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 77.96 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 2.06 pt/W | 0.61 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 72.31W |
AMD Sempron 145 ![]() | AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
250 vs 5000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
E8400 vs 5000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
140 vs 5000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $30 | |
3220 vs 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $30 | |
E8400 vs 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | ||
270 vs 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | ||
250 vs 145 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||