Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 145

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 145

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Sempron 145 vs the Athlon 1620.

Front view of AMD Athlon 1620

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 1620

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon 1620 vs the Sempron 145.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 145 vs Athlon 1620

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Sempron 145
1,332
Athlon 1620
1,828

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 145  vs
Athlon 1620 
Clock speed 2.8 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
AM3
AM2
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

power consumption

TDP 45W 45W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 2.06 pt/W 1.1 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 36.56W

details

Sempron 145  vs
Athlon 1620 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 0 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 0 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 63°C Unknown - 55°C

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Sempron 145
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 1620
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus