Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD Athlon X2 5600+

AMD Athlon X2 5600+

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 140

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 140

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 1 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 1 MB l3 cache is just OK
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 1.95 pt/W vs 0.68 pt/W Around 3x better performance per watt
Much more l3 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 1 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 72.31W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.69 GHz vs 3.26 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 77.96 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 21.44 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.93 GHz vs 3.4 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Athlon X2 5600+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 5600+

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better PassMark score 1,477 vs 738 More than 2x better PassMark score
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 5% higher clock speed
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C vs 63 °C More than 10% higher Maximum operating temperature

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 140 vs Athlon X2 5600+

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Sempron 140
105,900 MB/s
Athlon X2 5600+
76.7 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 140  vs
Athlon X2 5600+ 
Clock speed 2.7 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
AM3
AM2
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 45W 89W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 21.44 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 77.96 $/year
Performance per watt 1.95 pt/W 0.68 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 72.31W

details

Sempron 140  vs
Athlon X2 5600+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 1 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.82 - 1.35V 1.3 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 63°C 55 - 70°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.69 GHz 3.26 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.93 GHz 3.4 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,557.8 1,643.2
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.69 GHz 3.26 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Sempron 140
Report a correction
AMD Athlon X2 5600+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus