0 Comments
| AMD Sempron 140 vs Athlon II 170u |
Released July, 2009
AMD Sempron 140
- 2.7 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 140
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.93 GHz |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Athlon II 170u
- 2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Athlon II 170u
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 16.25W | ![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 80 °C |
![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 4.82 $/year | ![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 17.52 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.93 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | More than 95% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 16.25W | vs | 36.56W | 2.2x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 80 °C | vs | 63 °C | More than 25% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 4.82 $/year | vs | 10.84 $/year | 2.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 17.52 $/year | vs | 39.42 $/year | 2.2x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 140 vs Athlon II 170u
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 140
1,324
Athlon II 170u
997
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 140
1,331
Athlon II 170u
991
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 140
105,900 MB/s
Athlon II 170u
78,400 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Sempron 140
738
Athlon II 170u
626
PassMark (Single Core)
Sempron 140
839
Athlon II 170u
634
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 140 | vs | Athlon II 170u |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 2,000 MHz | 1,800 MHz |
details | Sempron 140 | vs | Athlon II 170u |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 63°C | Unknown - 80°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.69 GHz | 3.11 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.93 GHz | 2 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 1,557.8 | 1,383.9 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.69 GHz | 3.11 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 45W | 20W | |
Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 4.82 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 17.52 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.95 pt/W | 3.3 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 16.25W |
AMD Sempron 140 ![]() | AMD Athlon II 170u ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
3220 vs 140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
5000+ vs 140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
250 vs 140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
E6300 vs 140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | ||
E8400 vs 140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | ||
145 vs 140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$130 | ||
3210 vs 170u | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||