Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 140

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 140

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 1 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 1 MB l3 cache is just OK
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Much more l3 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 1 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 63 °C vs 49 °C Around 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 54.44W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 58.69 $/year Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 16.14 $/year Around 35% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 3200+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon 3200+ vs the Sempron 140.

Features Key features of the Sempron 140  vs Athlon 3200+ 

clock speed

Sempron 140
2.7 GHz
Athlon 3200+
2 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 140  vs
Athlon 3200+ 
Clock speed 2.7 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
AM3
939
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 45W 67W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 16.14 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 58.69 $/year
Typical power consumption 36.56W 54.44W

details

Sempron 140  vs
Athlon 3200+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 1 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 63°C Unknown - 49°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 5 4

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Sempron 140
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 3200+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus