AMD Sempron 140 vs Athlon 1620 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Sempron 140 vs the Athlon 1620. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon 1620 vs the Sempron 140. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 140 vs Athlon 1620
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 140 | vs | Athlon 1620 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM3 | |||
| AM2 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 45W | 45W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.95 pt/W | 1.1 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 36.56W | |
details | Sempron 140 | vs | Athlon 1620 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 1 MB | 0 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 90 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 63°C | Unknown - 55°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 AMD Sempron 140  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon 1620 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 140 vs 250 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| 140 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 140 vs 5000+ | ||
| | VS |  |
| 140 vs 240 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 140 vs E6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $179 | ||
| 140 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 140 vs 965 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
