0 Comments
| AMD Sempron 140 vs Athlon 1620 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Sempron 140 vs the Athlon 1620. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon 1620 vs the Sempron 140. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 140 vs Athlon 1620
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Sempron 140
1,284
Athlon 1620
923
GeekBench
Sempron 140
1,284
Athlon 1620
1,828
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Sempron 140
738
Athlon 1620
571
PassMark (Single Core)
Sempron 140
839
Athlon 1620
673
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Sempron 140 | vs | Athlon 1620 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
AM3 | |||
AM2 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
power consumption | |||
TDP | 45W | 45W | |
Annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.95 pt/W | 1.1 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 36.56W | 36.56W |
details | Sempron 140 | vs | Athlon 1620 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 1 MB | 0 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 90 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 63°C | Unknown - 55°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
AMD Sempron 140 ![]() | AMD Athlon 1620 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
140 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
140 vs 250 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
140 vs 5000+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | ||
140 vs 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | ||
140 vs 630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
140 vs 240 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
140 vs E6300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||