Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 1250

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 1250

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W vs 72.31W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 75 °C vs 70 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year vs 77.96 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost
Much lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year vs 21.44 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon 64 3000+ vs the Sempron 1250.

Features Key features of the Sempron 1250  vs Athlon 64 3000+ 

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Sempron 1250  vs
Athlon 64 3000+ 
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
AM2
754

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Sempron 1250  vs
Athlon 64 3000+ 
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 75°C Unknown - 70°C

power consumption

TDP 45W 89W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 21.44 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 77.96 $/year
Typical power consumption 36.56W 72.31W
AMD Sempron 1250
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3000+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus