Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Sempron 1250

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 1250

Report a correction
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 75 °C vs 55 °C More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of AMD Athlon 1620

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 1620

Report a correction
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines

Benchmarks Real world tests of Sempron 1250 vs Athlon 1620

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)

sysmark 2007 (overall)

sysmark 2007 (3d)

sysmark 2007 (video creation)

sysmark 2007 (productivity)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Sempron 1250  vs
Athlon 1620 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
Is unlocked No No


Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions

power consumption

TDP 45W 45W
Annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year 10.84 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year 39.42 $/year
Performance per watt 1.21 pt/W 1.1 pt/W
Typical power consumption 36.56W 36.56W


Sempron 1250  vs
Athlon 1620 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 0 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 0 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 75°C Unknown - 55°C

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Sempron 1250
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 1620
Report a correction

Read more


comments powered by Disqus