Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Second Generation Opteron 2216

Reasons to consider the
AMD Second Generation Opteron 2216

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of AMD Phenom II X6 1045T

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 3 MB vs 2 MB 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
More cores 6 vs 2 Three times as many cores; run more applications at once
Newer Sep, 2010 vs Aug, 2006 Release date over 4 years later
More threads 6 vs 2 Three times as many threads

Features Key features of the Second Generation Opteron 2216  vs Phenom II X6 1045T 

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Second Generation Opteron 2216  vs
Phenom II X6 1045T 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Hexa core
Socket type
F
AM3

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Second Generation Opteron 2216  vs
Phenom II X6 1045T 
Threads 2 6
L2 cache 2 MB 3 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 2 1

power consumption

TDP 95W 95W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 83.22 $/year
Typical power consumption 77.19W 77.19W
AMD Second Generation Opteron 2216
Report a correction
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus