Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO Ryzen™ 7 PRO 1700X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO Ryzen™ 7 PRO 1700X

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C vs 57 °C More than 65% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of AMD FX 9590

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 9590

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking

Benchmarks Real world tests of Ryzen 7 PRO Ryzen™ 7 PRO 1700X vs FX 9590

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Ryzen 7 PRO Ryzen™ 7 PRO 1700X  vs
FX 9590 
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 4.7 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.8 GHz 5 GHz
Cores Octa core Octa core
Is unlocked No Yes

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
AVX 2.0

details

Ryzen 7 PRO Ryzen™ 7 PRO 1700X  vs
FX 9590 
Threads 16 8
L2 cache 4 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 32 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 95°C Unknown - 57°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.5 GHz 5.08 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.01 GHz 5.06 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.5 GHz 5.08 GHz

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 178.75W
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO Ryzen™ 7 PRO 1700X
Report a correction
AMD FX 9590
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus