0 Comments
| AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600X vs FX 8350 |
First seen on April, 2017
AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600X
- 3.6 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600X
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | ![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 95 °C |
VS
Released October, 2012
AMD FX 8350
- 4 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the FX 8350
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 4 GHz | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 95 °C | vs | 61 °C | More than 55% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 3.6 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core |
Features Key features of the Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600X vs FX 8350
clock speed
Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600X
3.6 GHz
FX 8350
4 GHz
turbo clock speed
Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600X
4 GHz
FX 8350
4.2 GHz
L2 cache
FX 8350
8 MB
L3 cache
Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600X
16 MB
FX 8350
8 MB
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600X | vs | FX 8350 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 4 GHz | 4.2 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Octa core | |
Is unlocked | Yes | Yes | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
XOP | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
ABM | |||
BMI1 | |||
CLMUL | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
FMA3 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
TBM | |||
AVX 2.0 |
details | Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600X | vs | FX 8350 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 12 | 8 | |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 8 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2.67 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 14 nm | 32 nm | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 95°C | Unknown - 61°C | |
power consumption | |||
Typical power consumption | N/A | 159.66W |
AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600X ![]() | AMD FX 8350 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $128 | |
3770K vs 8350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $128 | |
6700K vs 8350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | $128 | |
8370 vs 8350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $128 | |
6300 vs 8350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $128 | |
6600K vs 8350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$190 | $128 | |
4460 vs 8350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $128 | |
9590 vs 8350 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 7 comments.
Mauro Moraes Sa (02:19 PM, August 23, 2017)
Mauro Moraes Sa (02:19 PM, August 23, 2017)
Mauro Moraes Sa (02:18 PM, August 23, 2017)
Mauro Moraes Sa (02:18 PM, August 23, 2017)
Mauro Moraes Sa (02:18 PM, August 23, 2017)
Mauro Moraes Sa (02:18 PM, August 23, 2017)
Guest (08:53 PM, July 28, 2017)