AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 vs FX 8350 |
First seen on April, 2017
AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600
- 3.2 GHz
- Hexa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600
 | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
by www.tweaktown.com (Jun, 2017)Performance83%Quality90%Features90%Value95% Overall TweakTown Rating90% The Bottom Line: AMD's Ryzen 5 1600 is a solid performing 6 core 12 thread CPU at an affordable price point, and while the Ryzen 5 1400 might not have all the cores that Ryzen is known for, both are great value buys.
VS
Released October, 2012
AMD FX 8350
- 4 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
by Tech Radar (Nov, 2012)Maybe not the top-end eight-core FX-8150, but the great value and overclocking capabilities of the six-core FX-6200 made it a tantalising prospect for anyone on a budget looking to put together a gaming rig.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the FX 8350 vs the Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600. | |||||||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 vs FX 8350
clock speed
turbo clock speed
L2 cache
L3 cache
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 | vs | FX 8350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Octa core | |
| Is unlocked | Yes | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 1.1 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| XOP | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| ABM | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| CLMUL | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| CVT16 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| TBM | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
details | Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600 | vs | FX 8350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 12 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 2.67 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 32 nm | |
power consumption | |||
| Typical power consumption | N/A | 159.66W | |
 AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600  Report a correction |  AMD FX 8350 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $100 | $128 | |
| 6300 vs 8350 | ||
 | VS | |
| $264 | $128 | |
| 3770K vs 8350 | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | $128 | |
| 8370 vs 8350 | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | $128 | |
| 6700K vs 8350 | ||
 | VS | |
| $230 | $128 | |
| 9590 vs 8350 | ||
 | VS | |
| $170 | $128 | |
| 8300 vs 8350 | ||
 | VS | |
| $140 | $128 | |
| 8320 vs 8350 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9420 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6700K | ||
