Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600

Reasons to consider the
AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 3 MB vs 1 MB 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much more l3 cache 16 MB vs 0.5 MB 32x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More cores 6 vs 2 Three times as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 12 vs 2 10 more threads
Much more l3 cache per core 2.67 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core Around 10.8x more l3 cache per core
Front view of AMD E2 3200

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 3200

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the E2 3200 vs the Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600.

Features Key features of the Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600  vs E2 3200 

clock speed

L2 cache

L3 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600  vs
E2 3200 
Clock speed 3.2 GHz 2.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 3.6 GHz None
Cores Hexa core Dual core
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
FMA3
AMD-V
3DNow!
AES
AVX 2.0

details

Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600  vs
E2 3200 
Threads 12 2
L2 cache 3 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 16 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 2.67 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 32 nm

power consumption

Typical power consumption N/A 52.81W
AMD Ryzen 5 Ryzen™ 5 1600
Report a correction
AMD E2 3200
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus