Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD R R-260H

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD R R-260H

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD R R-260H

Reasons to consider the
AMD R R-260H

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 13.81W vs 52.81W 3.8x lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better performance per watt 4.7 pt/W vs 0.89 pt/W More than 5.2x better performance per watt
Better PassMark (Single core) score 851 vs 691 Around 25% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much lower annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year vs 15.66 $/year 3.8x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year vs 56.94 $/year 3.8x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.75 GHz vs 2.1 GHz More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.13 GHz vs 2.1 GHz Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of R R-260H vs Athlon 64 X2 4400+

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

R R-260H  vs
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ 
Clock speed 2.1 GHz 2.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

R R-260H  vs
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.1 GHz 2.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.1 GHz 3.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.1 GHz 2.75 GHz

power consumption

TDP 17W 65W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 14.89 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 4.7 pt/W 0.89 pt/W
Typical power consumption 13.81W 52.81W
AMD R R-260H
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus