Winner
AMD Phenom X4 9950
CPUBoss recommends the AMD Phenom X4 9950 based on its .
See full details AMD Phenom X4 9950 vs II X4 965 |
VS
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 9950 vs 965 among desktop CPUs (over 75W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 2.7 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Phenom X4 9950 vs the Phenom II X4 965. | |||||||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Phenom II X4 965 vs the Phenom X4 9950. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom X4 9950 vs II X4 965
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Phenom X4 9950 | vs | II X4 965 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM2+ | |||
| AM3 | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 140W | 140W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 33.73 $/year | 54.06 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 122.64 $/year | 152.42 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.88 pt/W | 1.08 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 113.75W | 152.93W | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 2,000 MHz | 2,000 MHz | |
details | Phenom X4 9950 | vs | II X4 965 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 6 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 64°C | Unknown - 62°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.11 GHz | 4.05 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.37 GHz | 4.22 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 2,145.3 | 3,136.7 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.11 GHz | 4.05 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 AMD Phenom X4 9950  Report a correction |  AMD Phenom II X4 965 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $200 | $100 | |
| 965 vs 6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 965 vs 640 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | $125 | |
| 965 vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 965 vs 250 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | $104 | |
| 965 vs 1055T | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | $80 | |
| 965 vs 4300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | $128 | |
| 965 vs 8350 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
