CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 9750B vs 340 among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Phenom X4 9750B

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom X4 9750B

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Front view of AMD Athlon X2 340

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 340

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 70% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better performance per watt 11.57 pt/W vs 1.08 pt/W More than 10.8x better performance per watt
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 77.19W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Aug, 2008 Release date over 4 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom X4 9750B vs Athlon X2 340

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Phenom X4 9750B  vs
Athlon X2 340 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 3.2 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
SSE3
SSE
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 65W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 1.08 pt/W 11.57 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 52.81W

details

Phenom X4 9750B  vs
Athlon X2 340 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 1.05 - 1.25V 0.82 - 1.48V

overclocking

Overclock popularity 4 0
Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 4.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 3.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 4.1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Phenom X4 9750B
Report a correction
AMD Athlon X2 340
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus