CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 9750 vs 6000+

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit)

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Winner
AMD Phenom X4 9750 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Phenom X4 9750  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Phenom X4 9750

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD Phenom X4 9750

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Phenom X4 9750

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom X4 9750

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 65 nms vs 90 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better SysMark 2007 video creation score 195 vs 152 Around 30% better SysMark 2007 video creation score
More l3 cache 2 MB vs 0 MB Compared to all cpus, 2 MB l3 cache is just OK
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly better SysMark 2007 overall score 148 vs 133 More than 10% better SysMark 2007 overall score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly higher Maximum Operating Temperature 61 °C vs 55 °C More than 10% higher Maximum Operating Temperature
More l3 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0 MB/core Compared to all cpus, 0.5 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK
Better SysMark 2007 productivity score 145 vs 125 More than 15% better SysMark 2007 productivity score
Better PassMark score 2,835 vs 1,600 More than 75% better PassMark score
Better geekbench (32-bit) score 4,036 vs 2,183 Around 85% better geekbench (32-bit) score
Better 3DMark11 physics score 2,540 vs 1,400 More than 80% better 3DMark11 physics score
Marginally newer Mar, 2008 vs Feb, 2007 Release date over 1 years later
Better SysMark 2007 3D score 138 vs 131 More than 5% better SysMark 2007 3D score
Better cinebench r10 32Bit score 9,530 vs 5,595 More than 70% better cinebench r10 32Bit score
Front view of AMD Athlon X2 6000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 6000+

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.32 GHz vs 2.77 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.53 GHz vs 3.17 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom X4 9750 vs Athlon X2 6000+

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Phenom X4 9750 Athlon X2 6000+ @ community.futuremark.com
Page 1 - AMD Gets a Much Needed Speed Boost Page 2 - Pricing and Power Use Page 3 - The Test System Page 4 - Sisoft; Sandra 2007 Page 5 - POV-Ray 3.7 Beta 13a Page 6 - POV-Ray Real-Time Raytracing Page 7 - Super Pi XS 1.5 Page 8 - CineBench 9.5 Page 9 - ScienceMark 2.0 Page 10 - WinRar v3.61 Page 11 - Futuremark 3DMark06 Page 12 - Overclocking Page 13 - Power Consumption Page 14 - Final Thoughts and Conclusions.
Athlon X2 6000+ | by Legit Reviews (Feb, 2007)

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)

sysmark 2007 (overall)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Phenom X4 9750  vs
Athlon X2 6000+ 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
AM2+
AM2
Is unlocked No No
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE3
SSE2
SSE4a
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

details

Phenom X4 9750  vs
Athlon X2 6000+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nms 90 nms
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 61°C Unknown - 55°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 2 26
Overclocked clock speed 2.77 GHz 3.32 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.17 GHz 3.53 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.77 GHz 3.32 GHz

power consumption

TDP 125W 125W
Annual home energy cost 30.11 $/year 30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 109.5 $/year 109.5 $/year
Performance per watt 3.1 pt/W 2.3 pt/W
Typical power consumption 101.56W 101.56W
AMD Phenom X4 9750
Report a correction
AMD Athlon X2 6000+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus