Winner
AMD Phenom X4 9750
CPUBoss recommends the AMD Phenom X4 9750 based on its .
See full details| | AMD Phenom X4 9750 vs Athlon X2 6000+ |
| | Newer manufacturing process 65 nms | | Much better SysMark 2007 video creation score 195 |
| | More l3 cache 2 MB | | More cores 4 |
| | Higher clock speed 3 GHz | | Significantly more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
| | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.32 GHz | | Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.53 GHz |
by Legit Reviews (Feb, 2007)Overall overclocking was a great success!
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| Phenom X4 9750 6.0 Athlon X2 6000+ 5.6 | |
| Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and GeekBench (64-bit) | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| Phenom X4 9750 6.7 Athlon X2 6000+ 6.9 | |
| Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and Passmark (Single Core) | |
Overclocking | |
How much speed can you get out of the processor? | |
| Phenom X4 9750 6.3 Athlon X2 6000+ 6.5 | |
| Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Phenom X4 9750 N/A Athlon X2 6000+ N/A | |
| Performance Per Dollar | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
| Phenom X4 9750 6.3 Athlon X2 6000+ 6.2 | |
AMD Phenom X4 9750CPUBoss Winner | | |
| |||||||
| Newer manufacturing process | 65 nms | vs | 90 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better SysMark 2007 video creation score | 195 | vs | 152 | Around 30% better SysMark 2007 video creation score | |||
| More l3 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0 MB | Compared to all cpus, 2 MB l3 cache is just OK | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Significantly better SysMark 2007 overall score | 148 | vs | 133 | More than 10% better SysMark 2007 overall score | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Significantly higher Maximum Operating Temperature | 61 °C | vs | 55 °C | More than 10% higher Maximum Operating Temperature | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0 MB/core | Compared to all cpus, 0.5 MB/core l3 cache per core is just OK | |||
| Better SysMark 2007 productivity score | 145 | vs | 125 | More than 15% better SysMark 2007 productivity score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 2,835 | vs | 1,600 | More than 75% better PassMark score | |||
| Better geekbench (32-bit) score | 4,036 | vs | 2,183 | Around 85% better geekbench (32-bit) score | |||
| Better 3DMark11 physics score | 2,540 | vs | 1,400 | More than 80% better 3DMark11 physics score | |||
| Marginally newer | Mar, 2008 | vs | Feb, 2007 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Better SysMark 2007 3D score | 138 | vs | 131 | More than 5% better SysMark 2007 3D score | |||
| Better cinebench r10 32Bit score | 9,530 | vs | 5,595 | More than 70% better cinebench r10 32Bit score | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.32 GHz | vs | 2.77 GHz | Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.53 GHz | vs | 3.17 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Athlon X2 6000+ | by Legit Reviews (Feb, 2007)Page 1 - AMD Gets a Much Needed Speed Boost Page 2 - Pricing and Power Use Page 3 - The Test System Page 4 - Sisoft; Sandra 2007 Page 5 - POV-Ray 3.7 Beta 13a Page 6 - POV-Ray Real-Time Raytracing Page 7 - Super Pi XS 1.5 Page 8 - CineBench 9.5 Page 9 - ScienceMark 2.0 Page 10 - WinRar v3.61 Page 11 - Futuremark 3DMark06 Page 12 - Overclocking Page 13 - Power Consumption Page 14 - Final Thoughts and Conclusions.
summary | Phenom X4 9750 | vs | Athlon X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM2+ | |||
| AM2 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
details | Phenom X4 9750 | vs | Athlon X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 0 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nms | 90 nms | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 61°C | Unknown - 55°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 2 | 26 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.77 GHz | 3.32 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.17 GHz | 3.53 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.77 GHz | 3.32 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 125W | 125W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 30.11 $/year | 30.11 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 109.5 $/year | 109.5 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.1 pt/W | 2.3 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 101.56W | 101.56W | |
| AMD Phenom X4 9750 | AMD Athlon X2 6000+ |
| VS | |
| $50 | ||
| 9750 vs E8600 | ||
| VS | |
| $63 | ||
| 9750 vs Q6600 | ||
| VS | |
| $170 | $20 | |
| 6000+ vs E8400 | ||
| VS | |
| $170 | $70 | |
| 6000+ vs 6400+ | ||
| VS | |
| $170 | ||
| 6000+ vs 5000+ | ||
| VS | |
| $170 | ||
| 6000+ vs 7750 | ||
| VS | |
| $170 | $110 | |
| 6000+ vs 6300 | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $253 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
| VS | |
| $281 | $97 | |
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | $161 | |
| 3110M vs N3530 | ||
| VS | |
| $325 | $340 | |
| 4770K vs 4790K | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | ||
| 3217U vs N2830 | ||
| VS | |
| $378 | ||
| 5750M vs 4700MQ | ||
| VS | |
| 5 Octa vs 800 | ||