CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 9650 vs 6000+ among desktop CPUs (over 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

1.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Phenom X4 9650 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Phenom X4 9650  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Phenom X4 9650

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom X4 9650

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Phenom X4 9650 vs the Athlon X2 6000+.

Front view of AMD Athlon X2 6000+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon X2 6000+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Athlon X2 6000+ vs the Phenom X4 9650.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom X4 9650 vs Athlon X2 6000+

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Phenom X4 9650
88,700 MB/s
Athlon X2 6000+
86.1 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Phenom X4 9650  vs
Athlon X2 6000+ 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 3 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
AM2+
AM2
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 125W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 109.5 $/year
Performance per watt 1.15 pt/W 0.53 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 101.56W

details

Phenom X4 9650  vs
Athlon X2 6000+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 0 MB
L3 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 70°C Unknown - 55°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 5 26
Overclocked clock speed 2.81 GHz 3.33 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.12 GHz 3.53 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 672.3 1,612.2
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.81 GHz 3.33 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Phenom X4 9650
Report a correction
AMD Athlon X2 6000+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus