Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A8 6410

AMD A8 6410

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Phenom X4 9650

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom X4 9650

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2.3 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Slightly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 4,005 vs 3,534 Around 15% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Front view of AMD A8 6410

Reasons to consider the
AMD A8 6410

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 1,120,000 MB/s vs 88,700 MB/s Around 12.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 22.75 pt/W vs 1.15 pt/W More than 19.8x better performance per watt
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 77.19W 6.3x lower typical power consumption
Newer Jul, 2014 vs Mar, 2008 Release date over 6 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 22.89 $/year 6.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 83.22 $/year 6.3x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom X4 9650 vs A8 6410

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A8 6410
3,534

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A8 6410
1,228

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Phenom X4 9650
88,700 MB/s
A8 6410
1,120,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A8 6410
3,344

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A8 6410
3,702

GeekBench

A8 6410
3,702

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

A8 6410
2,536

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Phenom X4 9650  vs
A8 6410 
Clock speed 2.3 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
AM2+
BGA 769
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Phenom X4 9650  vs
A8 6410 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 70°C Unknown - 71.3°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon R5 series
GPU clock speed N/A 800 MHz

power consumption

TDP 95W 15W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 1.15 pt/W 22.75 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 12.19W
AMD Phenom X4 9650
Report a correction
AMD A8 6410
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus