CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 8750 vs 6300 among desktop CPUs (over 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

4.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Phenom X3 8750 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Phenom X3 8750  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Phenom X3 8750

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom X3 8750

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Phenom X3 8750 vs the FX 6300.

Front view of AMD FX 6300

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 6300

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the FX 6300 vs the Phenom X3 8750.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom X3 8750 vs FX 6300

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6300
7,871

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6300
2,053

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Phenom X3 8750
89,050 MB/s
FX 6300
2,290,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6300
7,447

GeekBench

FX 6300
9,503

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

FX 6300
16,213

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

FX 6300
6,444

PassMark (Single Core)

FX 6300
1,446

Reviews Word on the street

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Phenom X3 8750  vs
FX 6300 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Tri core Hexa core
Socket type
AM2+
AM3+
Is unlocked Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 95W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 1.26 pt/W 9.84 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 77.19W

bus

Clock speed 1,800 MHz 2,600 MHz

details

Phenom X3 8750  vs
FX 6300 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 3 6
L2 cache 2 MB 6 MB
L2 cache per core 0.67 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 0.67 MB/core 1.33 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 1.05 - 1.25V 0.8 - 1.43V
Operating temperature Unknown - 71°C Unknown - 62.5°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.98 GHz 4.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.4 GHz 4.82 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 1,911.5 7,541
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.98 GHz 4.75 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Phenom X3 8750
Report a correction
AMD FX 6300
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus