CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 8750 vs 6410 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Phenom X3 8750 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Phenom X3 8750  based on its single-core performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Phenom X3 8750

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom X3 8750

Report a correction
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,637 vs 884 More than 85% better PassMark (Single core) score
More l2 cache per core 0.67 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core Around 35% more l2 cache per core
Front view of AMD A8 6410

Reasons to consider the
AMD A8 6410

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 22.75 pt/W vs 1.26 pt/W Around 18.2x better performance per watt
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 12.19W vs 77.19W 6.3x lower typical power consumption
Newer Jul, 2014 vs Apr, 2008 Release date over 6 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 3.61 $/year vs 22.89 $/year 6.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 13.14 $/year vs 83.22 $/year 6.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
More cores 4 vs 3 1 more cores; run more applications at once

Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom X3 8750 vs A8 6410

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A8 6410
3,534

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A8 6410
1,228

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Phenom X3 8750
89,050 MB/s
A8 6410
1,120,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A8 6410
3,344

GeekBench

A8 6410
3,702

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

A8 6410
2,536

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Phenom X3 8750  vs
A8 6410 
Clock speed 2.4 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Tri core Quad core
Socket type
AM2+
BGA 769
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Phenom X3 8750  vs
A8 6410 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 3 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.67 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 1.05 - 1.25V 0.5 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 71°C Unknown - 71.3°C

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon R5 series
GPU clock speed N/A 800 MHz

power consumption

TDP 95W 15W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 1.26 pt/W 22.75 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 12.19W
AMD Phenom X3 8750
Report a correction
AMD A8 6410
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus