CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1100T vs 8350 among desktop CPUs (over 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD FX 8350 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 8350  based on its value.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD FX 8350

AMD FX 8350

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Phenom II X6 Black 1100T vs the FX 8350.

Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 3 MB Around 2.8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better PassMark score 9,134 vs 5,877 More than 55% better PassMark score
Much better performance per dollar 8.3 pt/$ vs 0.01 pt/$ More than 1037x better performance per dollar
Much higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 8.79 GHz vs 4.14 GHz More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Much better cinebench r10 32Bit score 22,674 vs 18,889 More than 20% better cinebench r10 32Bit score
Much better performance per watt 5.83 pt/W vs 1.53 pt/W More than 3.8x better performance per watt
Much better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score 4,338 vs 4,100 More than 5% better cinebench r10 32Bit 1-core score
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Dec, 2010 Release date over 1 years later
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.73 GHz vs 4.07 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom II X6 Black 1100T vs FX 8350

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 8350
2,470,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Reviews Word on the street

Phenom II X6 Black 1100T  vs FX 8350 

8.0
6.0
The AMD CPU has other benefits, though: its unlocked multiplier, which makes for drastically simplified overclocking; and the fact that AMD's unified socket design means that the CPU will work in essentially any AMD motherboard on the market.
Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

9.0
8.0
AMD has finessed the new 1100T's pricing carefully and it matches up well with the Intel Core i7 870 in multithreaded benchmarks such as video encoding and professional 3D rendering.
Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

Overall

9.1 Out of 10
7.9 Out of 10

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Phenom II X6 Black 1100T  vs
FX 8350 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 4 GHz
Cores Hexa core Octa core
Socket type
AM3
AM3+
Is unlocked Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1333
DDR2-1066
DDR3
DDR2
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s

details

Phenom II X6 Black 1100T  vs
FX 8350 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 6 8
L2 cache 3 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 904,000,000 1,200,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 16 21
Voltage range 1 - 1.48V 0.82 - 1.45V
Operating temperature Unknown - 62°C Unknown - 61°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 280 709
Overclock review score 1 0.95
Overclocked clock speed 4.07 GHz 4.73 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.14 GHz 8.79 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 2,532.3 10,147
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.07 GHz 4.73 GHz

power consumption

TDP 125W 125W
Annual home energy cost 47.78 $/year 56.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 138.23 $/year 159.62 $/year
Performance per watt 1.53 pt/W 5.83 pt/W
Idle power consumption 76.6W 92W
Peak power consumption 157.8W 182.21W
Typical power consumption N/A 159.66W

bus

Clock speed 2,000 MHz 2,600 MHz
AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T
Report a correction
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

Showing 7 comments.
i must have been confused when i wrote this. i can't even remember why i did or how i came to my conclusion in the first place haha
Since when does the 6350 kill it? In single threaded apps, the 8350 will still do better as its clocked at 4ghz stock, while the 6350 is 3.9ghz they are the same chip, just 1 has more cores, nothing else,
mine a 1100t no degrade is still running at 4027.Mhz more than one year and I can still bump up but a little choppy so @ 4027 still runs like a charm water cooled on a Corsair H50 idle 23c full load 52c.... but 8350 is my next upgrade with a better water cooler probably corsair H-100 and OC hopefully 4.8
I'd prefer u get an 8350 and O.C. it to the 9590 5Ghz. Benchmark tests proved that 9590 is still slightly inferior to the 8350 O.Ced to 5Ghz. hah i know my suggestion is damn late. :(
how does this have the same "performance" of an 8350, yet the 6350 kills it?
Agreed with awi5951, 1100t was a champ in it's day but over time and constant use at 4.3 GHz it's now degraded to 3.9 GHz. Saving up for when the 9370 because the cost of the 9590 "IS TOO DAMN HIGH".
My amd 1100t started to degrade after about a year of being overclocked to 4g now i can only run at 3.7
comments powered by Disqus