CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1100T vs 8350

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Cinebench R11.5, Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Cinebench R11.5 (1-core), Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and 1 more

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Passmark (Overclocked), Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Winner
AMD FX 8350 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD FX 8350  based on its overclocking.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD FX 8350

AMD FX 8350

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

Report a correction
Much lower idle power consumption 76.6W vs 92W More than 15% lower idle power consumption
Much lower peak power consumption 157.8W vs 182.21W Around 15% lower peak power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 47.78 $/year vs 56.1 $/year Around 15% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 138.23 $/year vs 159.62 $/year Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 3 MB Around 2.8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 32 nms vs 45 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 6 MB Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Much better PassMark (Overclocked) score 10,147 vs 2,532.3 More than 4x better PassMark (Overclocked) score
More cores 8 vs 6 2 more cores; run more applications at once
Much better performance per dollar 5.47 pt/$ vs 1.82 pt/$ More than 3x better performance per dollar
Better PassMark score 9,134 vs 5,892 More than 55% better PassMark score
Significantly more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More threads 8 vs 6 2 more threads
Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,525 vs 1,266 More than 20% better PassMark (Single core) score
Better geekbench (64-bit) score 12,160 vs 9,070 Around 35% better geekbench (64-bit) score
Better 3DMark11 physics score 6,880 vs 5,190 Around 35% better 3DMark11 physics score
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.7 GHz vs 4.08 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Marginally newer Oct, 2012 vs Dec, 2010 Release date over 1 years later
Better cinebench r10 32Bit score 22,674 vs 18,889 More than 20% better cinebench r10 32Bit score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.99 GHz vs 4.18 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom II X6 Black 1100T vs FX 8350

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Phenom II X6 Black 1100T FX 8350 @ community.futuremark.com
The FX-8350 also gave us some significant gains in 3DMark 11.
FX 8350 | by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2012)

Cinebench R11.5

In Cinebench the AMD chip is only a little over 5 per cent slower, and in X264 there's less than a single per cent difference between them.
FX 8350 | by Tech Radar (Nov, 2012)

Cinebench R11.5 (Single Core)

Cinebench R10 - Seconds: Faster is better.
Phenom II X6 Black 1100T | by Tech Radar (Feb, 2011)

Passmark

Phenom II X6 Black 1100T FX 8350 @ cpubenchmark.net
Looking at the physics score we can see a difference of just under 900 points with the AMD FX-8350 taking the lead with 7325 3DMarks.
FX 8350 | by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2012)

Passmark (Single Core)

Curious about real world scenarios, we decided to drop Furmark and ran 3DMark 11 on the performance preset and took the maximum power consumption during the first GPU test.
FX 8350 | by Legit Reviews (Oct, 2012)

Reviews Word on the street

Phenom II X6 Black 1100T  vs FX 8350 

8.0
6.0
The AMD CPU has other benefits, though: its unlocked multiplier, which makes for drastically simplified overclocking; and the fact that AMD's unified socket design means that the CPU will work in essentially any AMD motherboard on the market.
Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

9.0
8.0
AMD has finessed the new 1100T's pricing carefully and it matches up well with the Intel Core i7 870 in multithreaded benchmarks such as video encoding and professional 3D rendering.
Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

Overall

9.1 Out of 10
7.9 Out of 10

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Phenom II X6 Black 1100T  vs
FX 8350 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 4 GHz
Cores Hexa core Octa core
Socket type
AM3
AM3+
Is unlocked Yes Yes
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
AVX
XOP
SSE3
SSE2
FMA4
F16C
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1333
DDR2-1066
DDR3
DDR2
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s

details

Phenom II X6 Black 1100T  vs
FX 8350 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 6 8
L2 cache 3 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclock popularity 280 709
Overclock review score 1 0.95
Overclocked clock speed 4.08 GHz 4.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.18 GHz 4.99 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 2,532.3 10,147
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.08 GHz 4.7 GHz

power consumption

TDP 125W 125W
Annual home energy cost 47.78 $/year 56.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 138.23 $/year 159.62 $/year
Performance per watt 4.55 pt/W 5.1 pt/W
Idle power consumption 76.6W 92W
Peak power consumption 157.8W 182.21W
Typical power consumption N/A 159.66W

bus

Clock speed 2,000 MHz 2,600 MHz
AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T
Report a correction
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

Showing 7 comments.
i must have been confused when i wrote this. i can't even remember why i did or how i came to my conclusion in the first place haha
Since when does the 6350 kill it? In single threaded apps, the 8350 will still do better as its clocked at 4ghz stock, while the 6350 is 3.9ghz they are the same chip, just 1 has more cores, nothing else,
mine a 1100t no degrade is still running at 4027.Mhz more than one year and I can still bump up but a little choppy so @ 4027 still runs like a charm water cooled on a Corsair H50 idle 23c full load 52c.... but 8350 is my next upgrade with a better water cooler probably corsair H-100 and OC hopefully 4.8
I'd prefer u get an 8350 and O.C. it to the 9590 5Ghz. Benchmark tests proved that 9590 is still slightly inferior to the 8350 O.Ced to 5Ghz. hah i know my suggestion is damn late. :(
how does this have the same "performance" of an 8350, yet the 6350 kills it?
Agreed with awi5951, 1100t was a champ in it's day but over time and constant use at 4.3 GHz it's now degraded to 3.9 GHz. Saving up for when the 9370 because the cost of the 9590 "IS TOO DAMN HIGH".
My amd 1100t started to degrade after about a year of being overclocked to 4g now i can only run at 3.7
comments powered by Disqus