AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T  vs FX 6300 

The FX-6300 uses Clustered Multithreading on a triple-module CPU to make 6 cores, split up into three groups of L3 cache. The 1100T was all real cores with their own cache, giving it a small advantage over the 6100 which was not noted in the comparison... but If you want a newer manufacturing process and better overclocking go with the 6300. If you want raw multitasking performance and no overclocking stick with a stock 1100t.

hmm, I do not know about that less overclocking head room on a Phenom. I got a 1100T up to 4.6GHz on air. and it was not breaking 65C at full load with a lame arctic 7 alpine cooler. the Phenom chips are still great chips.

Depends, The 8320 is at 3.5ghz with turbo, so in theory a poorly multi threaded app or a program that dosn't use a lot of core, the 1100T would win hands down, though not by a whole lot. My 1100T at 4.4ghz with a 3ghz CPU-NB beasts the FX9370 in Battlefield 4!! Although multi GPU setup tends to bottleneck sooner with the 1100T. It took my FX 8320 at 4.6ghz to beat my 1100T at 4.4ghz in the Firestrike becnhmark with 2x HD5850's with 5870 bios. Now If I left the CPU-NB at stock 2ghz then my 8320 would beat it at a lower clock, but most people fail to see how much the CPU-NB overclocking can improve the phenom's. Though I did get lucky, my 8320 will hit 5ghz at only 1.47v, its been running at that for just over a year now without any issues.

OK, another Bullshit from merchandising benchmarking companies, Transistor count:904,000,0001,600,000,000 Is like having two cilinder motor vs four cilinder motor.

If you compare AMD FX 8320 and AMD phenom II x6 1100T. then which one will win???

I'd go with the FX if I were you. The Phenom might be faster(by a reallllllly tiny bit), but the FX is newer.

Which one will be the best either AMD phenom II X6 1100T or AMD FX 6300. can any one suggest me...pleazzzzz