CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1100T vs 6300 among desktop CPUs (over 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

4.8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Phenom II X6 Black 1100T vs the FX 6300.

Front view of AMD FX 6300

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 6300

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the FX 6300 vs the Phenom II X6 Black 1100T.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom II X6 Black 1100T vs FX 6300

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 6300
2,290,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Reviews Word on the street

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Phenom II X6 Black 1100T  vs
FX 6300 
Clock speed 3.3 GHz 3.5 GHz
Cores Hexa core Hexa core
Socket type
AM3
AM3+
Is unlocked Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1333
DDR2-1066
DDR3
DDR2
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 21,333.32 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s

details

Phenom II X6 Black 1100T  vs
FX 6300 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 6 6
L2 cache 3 MB 6 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 1.33 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 904,000,000 1,200,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 16 20
Voltage range 1 - 1.48V 0.8 - 1.43V
Operating temperature Unknown - 62°C Unknown - 62.5°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 280 82
Overclock review score 1 0.8
Overclocked clock speed 4.08 GHz 4.75 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.14 GHz 4.82 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 2,532.3 7,541
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.08 GHz 4.75 GHz

power consumption

TDP 125W 95W
Annual home energy cost 47.78 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 138.23 $/year 83.22 $/year
Performance per watt 1.3 pt/W 9.84 pt/W
Typical power consumption N/A 77.19W

bus

Clock speed 2,000 MHz 2,600 MHz
AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T
Report a correction
AMD FX 6300
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

Showing 7 comments.
The FX-6300 uses Clustered Multithreading on a triple-module CPU to make 6 cores, split up into three groups of L3 cache. The 1100T was all real cores with their own cache, giving it a small advantage over the 6100 which was not noted in the comparison... but If you want a newer manufacturing process and better overclocking go with the 6300. If you want raw multitasking performance and no overclocking stick with a stock 1100t.
hmm, I do not know about that less overclocking head room on a Phenom. I got a 1100T up to 4.6GHz on air. and it was not breaking 65C at full load with a lame arctic 7 alpine cooler. the Phenom chips are still great chips.
Depends, The 8320 is at 3.5ghz with turbo, so in theory a poorly multi threaded app or a program that dosn't use a lot of core, the 1100T would win hands down, though not by a whole lot. My 1100T at 4.4ghz with a 3ghz CPU-NB beasts the FX9370 in Battlefield 4!! Although multi GPU setup tends to bottleneck sooner with the 1100T. It took my FX 8320 at 4.6ghz to beat my 1100T at 4.4ghz in the Firestrike becnhmark with 2x HD5850's with 5870 bios. Now If I left the CPU-NB at stock 2ghz then my 8320 would beat it at a lower clock, but most people fail to see how much the CPU-NB overclocking can improve the phenom's. Though I did get lucky, my 8320 will hit 5ghz at only 1.47v, its been running at that for just over a year now without any issues.
OK, another Bullshit from merchandising benchmarking companies, Transistor count:904,000,0001,600,000,000 Is like having two cilinder motor vs four cilinder motor.
If you compare AMD FX 8320 and AMD phenom II x6 1100T. then which one will win???
I'd go with the FX if I were you. The Phenom might be faster(by a reallllllly tiny bit), but the FX is newer.
Which one will be the best either AMD phenom II X6 1100T or AMD FX 6300. can any one suggest me...pleazzzzz
comments powered by Disqus