Winner
AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1090T
CPUBoss recommends the AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1090T based on its .
See full details| | AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1090T vs FX 8320E |
| | More cores 6 | | More threads 6 |
| | Better cinebench r11.5 score 5.68 | | Better geekbench (32-bit) score 8,328 |
by Tech Radar (May, 2010)What we have here is pretty much a four-core Deneb.
| | Much more l2 cache 8 MB | | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 4.4 GHz |
| | Newer manufacturing process 32 nms | | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
by Josh-Walrath (Sep, 2014)It is not so nice that the FX-8370 is not significantly faster than the older FX-8350 all the while costing an extra $20.
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| FX 8320E 6.7 | |
| Cinebench R11.5, Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| FX 8320E 7.9 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 (1-core), Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and 1 more | |
CPUBoss Score | |
Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value | |
| FX 8320E 7.3 | |
Winner |
AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1090TCPUBoss Winner | | |
| |||||||
| More cores | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More threads | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more threads | |||
| Better cinebench r11.5 score | 5.68 | vs | 3.28 | Around 75% better cinebench r11.5 score | |||
| Better geekbench (32-bit) score | 8,328 | vs | 5,303 | More than 55% better geekbench (32-bit) score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 5,702 | vs | 4,798 | Around 20% better PassMark score | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 146.29 $/year | vs | 173.45 $/year | More than 15% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 52.52 $/year | vs | 59.66 $/year | More than 10% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.25 GHz | vs | 4 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 8 MB | vs | 3 MB | Around 2.8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 4.4 GHz | vs | 3.6 GHz | More than 20% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Newer manufacturing process | 32 nms | vs | 45 nms | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| More l3 cache | 8 MB | vs | 6 MB | Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much more l3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l3 cache per core | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,554 | vs | 1,224 | More than 25% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 5.27 GHz | vs | 4.1 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Marginally newer | Feb, 2012 | vs | Apr, 2010 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Phenom II X6 Black 1090T | by Tech Radar (May, 2010)The first tests we threw at our subject were the x264 encoding and Cinebench rendering tests.
Phenom II X6 Black 1090T | by Tech Radar (May, 2010)The Cinebench rendering test is particularly impressive.
summary | Phenom II X6 Black 1090T | vs | FX 8320E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM3 | |||
| AM3+ | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | Yes | |
| Is hyperthreaded | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has vitualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction-set-extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AES | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
gpu | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR2-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR2 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 21,333.32 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
details | Phenom II X6 Black 1090T | vs | FX 8320E |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 6 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nms | 32 nms | |
| Transistor count | 904,000,000 | 1,600,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 1.13 - 1.4V | 0.81 - 1.41V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 62°C | Unknown - 61.1°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 54 | 11 | |
| Overclock review score | 4 | 0.7 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 5.27 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.25 GHz | 4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.1 GHz | 5.27 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 125W | 95W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 52.52 $/year | 59.66 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 146.29 $/year | 173.45 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 3.46 pt/W | 2.75 pt/W | |
| Idle power consumption | 88.5W | 95W | |
| Peak power consumption | 167W | 198W | |
| Typical power consumption | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | HyperTransport 3.0 | HyperTransport 3.1 | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Data rate | 8,000 MB/s | 10,400 MB/s | |
| Transfer rate | 4,000 MT/s | 5,200 MT/s | |
| Clock speed | 2,000 MHz | 2,600 MHz | |
| AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1090T | AMD FX 8320E |
| VS | |
| $170 | ||
| 8350 vs 1090T | ||
| VS | |
| $110 | ||
| 6300 vs 1090T | ||
| VS | |
| $143 | $100 | |
| 8320 vs 8320E | ||
| VS | |
| $110 | $100 | |
| 6300 vs 8320E | ||
| VS | |
| $170 | $100 | |
| 8350 vs 8320E | ||
| VS | |
| $90 | $100 | |
| 4300 vs 8320E | ||
| VS | |
| $250 | $100 | |
| 965 vs 8320E | ||
| VS | |
| $242 | $325 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| VS | |
| $161 | $225 | |
| N3530 vs 3110M | ||
| VS | |
| $340 | $325 | |
| 4790K vs 4770K | ||
| VS | |
| $225 | ||
| N2830 vs 3217U | ||
| VS | |
| $97 | $281 | |
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
| VS | |
| $378 | ||
| 4700MQ vs 5750M | ||
| VS | |
| 800 vs 5 Octa | ||