0 Comments
| AMD Phenom II X6 1055T vs Opteron 3260 HE |
Released May, 2010
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
- 2.8 GHz
- Hexa core
Reasons to buy the AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.95 GHz | ![]() | Slightly more l3 cache 6 MB |
![]() | More cores 6 | ![]() | Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,111 |
VS
Released March, 2012
AMD Opteron 3260 HE
- 2.7 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Opteron 3260 HE
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 4 MB | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
![]() | Higher turbo clock speed 3.7 GHz | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1055T vs 3260 HE among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
AMD Phenom II X6 1055TCPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.95 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slightly more l3 cache | 6 MB | vs | 4 MB | 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,111 | vs | 850 | More than 30% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better PassMark score | 5,004 | vs | 3,259 | Around 55% better PassMark score | |||
More threads | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more threads | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.02 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Significantly more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 3 MB | Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 3.7 GHz | vs | 3.3 GHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 54.4 $/year | 5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 165.56 $/year | 4.2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Better performance per watt | 2.54 pt/W | vs | 0.94 pt/W | Around 2.8x better performance per watt | |||
Newer | Mar, 2012 | vs | May, 2010 | Release date over 1 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom II X6 1055T vs Opteron 3260 HE
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Phenom II X6 1055T
5,004
Opteron 3260 HE
3,259
PassMark (Single Core)
Phenom II X6 1055T
1,111
Opteron 3260 HE
850
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Phenom II X6 1055T | vs | Opteron 3260 HE |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Cores | Hexa core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
AM3 | |||
AM3+ | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
power consumption | |||
TDP | 125W | 45W | |
Annual home energy cost | 54.4 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 165.56 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 0.94 pt/W | 2.54 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | N/A | 36.56W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | HyperTransport 3.0 | HyperTransport 3.0 | |
Clock speed | 2,000 MHz | 2,600 MHz |
details | Phenom II X6 1055T | vs | Opteron 3260 HE |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 6 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 14 | 13 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 62°C | Unknown - 61.1°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.95 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.02 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.95 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR2 |
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T ![]() | AMD Opteron 3260 HE ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | $100 | |
1055T vs 6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | $220 | |
1055T vs 2500K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | $95 | |
1055T vs 955 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | $200 | |
1055T vs 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | $125 | |
1055T vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | $205 | |
1055T vs 2400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$104 | $120 | |
1055T vs 6100 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
3220 vs 5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||