AMD Phenom II X6 1055T vs Opteron 3260 HE |
Released May, 2010
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
- 2.8 GHz
- Hexa core
5.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
 | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.95 GHz | | Slightly more l3 cache 6 MB |
| | More cores 6 | | Better PassMark (Single core) score 1,111 |
VS
Released March, 2012
AMD Opteron 3260 HE
- 2.7 GHz
- Quad core
5.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Opteron 3260 HE
| | Significantly more l2 cache 4 MB | | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
| | Higher turbo clock speed 3.7 GHz | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 1055T vs 3260 HE among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
AMD Phenom II X6 1055TCPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.95 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slightly more l3 cache | 6 MB | vs | 4 MB | 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| More cores | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,111 | vs | 850 | More than 30% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 5,004 | vs | 3,259 | Around 55% better PassMark score | |||
| More threads | 6 | vs | 4 | 2 more threads | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.02 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | Around 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 3 MB | Around 35% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 3.7 GHz | vs | 3.3 GHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 54.4 $/year | 5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 165.56 $/year | 4.2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Better performance per watt | 2.54 pt/W | vs | 0.94 pt/W | Around 2.8x better performance per watt | |||
| Newer | Mar, 2012 | vs | May, 2010 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom II X6 1055T vs Opteron 3260 HE
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Phenom II X6 1055T | vs | Opteron 3260 HE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
| Cores | Hexa core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM3 | |||
| AM3+ | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 125W | 45W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 54.4 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 165.56 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.94 pt/W | 2.54 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | N/A | 36.56W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | HyperTransport 3.0 | HyperTransport 3.0 | |
| Clock speed | 2,000 MHz | 2,600 MHz | |
details | Phenom II X6 1055T | vs | Opteron 3260 HE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 6 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 4 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 4 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 14 | 13 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 62°C | Unknown - 61.1°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.95 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.02 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.95 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR2 | |||
 AMD Phenom II X6 1055T  Report a correction |  AMD Opteron 3260 HE Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $104 | $100 | |
| 1055T vs 6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $104 | $220 | |
| 1055T vs 2500K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $104 | $95 | |
| 1055T vs 955 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $104 | $200 | |
| 1055T vs 965 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $104 | $125 | |
| 1055T vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $104 | $205 | |
| 1055T vs 2400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $104 | $120 | |
| 1055T vs 6100 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
