Winner
AMD Phenom II X4 965
CPUBoss recommends the AMD Phenom II X4 965 based on its performance and single-core performance.
See full details | AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs Opteron 1352 |
![]() | Is unlocked Yes | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | More l3 cache 6 MB |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 60.94W | ![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year |
![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year |
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more |
5.2 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
Winner |
AMD Phenom II X4 965CPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2.1 GHz | More than 60% higher clock speed | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 65 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More l3 cache | 6 MB | vs | 2 MB | 3x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.05 GHz | vs | 2.55 GHz | Around 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly more l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 3x more l3 cache per core | |||
Better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,361 | vs | 758 | Around 80% better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
Better PassMark score | 5,916 | vs | 2,368 | Around 2.5x better PassMark score | |||
Newer | Nov, 2009 | vs | Apr, 2008 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.22 GHz | vs | 2.77 GHz | More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much lower typical power consumption | 60.94W | vs | 152.93W | 2.5x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 18.07 $/year | vs | 54.06 $/year | 3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 65.7 $/year | vs | 152.42 $/year | 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost |
summary | Phenom II X4 965 | vs | Opteron 1352 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
AM3 | |||
AM2 | |||
AM2+ | |||
Is unlocked | Yes | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 140W | 75W | |
Annual home energy cost | 54.06 $/year | 18.07 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 152.42 $/year | 65.7 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.08 pt/W | 0.98 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 152.93W | 60.94W | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 2,000 MHz | 1,800 MHz |
details | Phenom II X4 965 | vs | Opteron 1352 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 6 MB | 2 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 17 | 10 | |
Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.43V | 1.2 - UnknownV | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.05 GHz | 2.55 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.22 GHz | 2.77 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 3,136.7 | 1,930.9 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.05 GHz | 2.55 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
AMD Phenom II X4 965 ![]() | AMD Opteron 1352 ![]() |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $200 | |
AMD FX 6300 vs Phenom II X4 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
AMD Athlon II X4 640 vs Phenom II X4 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $200 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD Phenom II X4 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
AMD Athlon II X2 250 vs Phenom II X4 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$80 | $200 | |
AMD FX 4300 vs Phenom II X4 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$128 | $200 | |
AMD FX 8350 vs Phenom II X4 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T vs X4 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||