CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 965 vs 8350 among desktop CPUs (over 75W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Phenom II X4 965 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Phenom II X4 965  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Phenom II X4 965

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II X4 965

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Phenom II X4 965 vs the FX 8350.

Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the FX 8350 vs the Phenom II X4 965.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom II X4 965 vs FX 8350

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 8350
11,483

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Phenom II X4 965
137,800 MB/s
FX 8350
2,470,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 8350
10,956

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

FX 8350
12,126

GeekBench

FX 8350
12,796

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Reviews Word on the street

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Phenom II X4 965  vs
FX 8350 
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 0 GHz 4.2 GHz
Cores Quad core Octa core
Socket type
AM3
AM3+
Is unlocked Yes Yes

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 2,000 MHz 2,600 MHz

details

Phenom II X4 965  vs
FX 8350 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 8
L2 cache 2 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 758,000,000 1,200,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 17 21
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.43V 0.81 - 1.45V
Operating temperature Unknown - 62°C Unknown - 61°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 22 709
Overclock review score 5 0.95
Overclocked clock speed 4.05 GHz 4.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.22 GHz 8.79 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 3,136.7 10,147
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.05 GHz 4.69 GHz

power consumption

TDP 140W 125W
Annual home energy cost 54.06 $/year 56.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 152.42 $/year 159.62 $/year
Performance per watt 1.08 pt/W 5.72 pt/W
Idle power consumption 89.7W 92W
Peak power consumption 174W 182.21W
Typical power consumption 152.93W 159.66W
AMD Phenom II X4 965
Report a correction
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
Thank you. Should I replace my AMD Phenom II simulation and see that an AMD FX is up. The alternative would be one of its Intel Xeon models, but is very expensive in comparison. When the mask that Intel will be paid for will be drawn? (Original: Gracias. Debo reemplazar mi AMD Phenom II de simulación y veo que un AMD FX está a la altura. La alternativa de Intel sería uno de sus modelos Xeon, pero esta muy caro en comparación. ¿Cuando se sacarán las máscara de que Intel les paga por existir?)
comments powered by Disqus