CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 965 vs 4130

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Cinebench R11.5 and Passmark

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Cinebench R11.5 (1-core) and Passmark (Single Core)

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 1 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Winner
AMD Phenom II X4 965 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Phenom II X4 965  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Phenom II X4 965

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD Phenom II X4 965

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Phenom II X4 965

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II X4 965

Report a correction
More l3 cache 6 MB vs 4 MB 50% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 50% more l3 cache per core
Better PassMark score 5,916 vs 4,190 More than 40% better PassMark score
Better cinebench r11.5 score 4 vs 3.11 Around 30% better cinebench r11.5 score
Better cinebench r11.5 (1-core) score 1.02 vs 0.95 More than 5% better cinebench r11.5 (1-core) score
Front view of AMD FX 4130

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4130

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Newer manufacturing process 32 nms vs 45 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Significantly lower typical power consumption 101.56W vs 152.93W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per dollar 8.53 pt/$ vs 2.86 pt/$ Around 3x better performance per dollar
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Marginally newer Aug, 2012 vs Nov, 2009 Release date over 2 years later
Better 3DMark11 physics score 5,990 vs 4,100 More than 45% better 3DMark11 physics score
Much lower annual home energy cost 30.11 $/year vs 54.06 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.54 GHz vs 4.07 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 109.5 $/year vs 152.42 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.53 GHz vs 4.14 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom II X4 965 vs FX 4130

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Phenom II X4 965 FX 4130 @ community.futuremark.com

Cinebench R11.5 (Single Core)

Passmark

Phenom II X4 965 FX 4130 @ cpubenchmark.net

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Phenom II X4 965  vs
FX 4130 
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
AM3
AM3+
Is unlocked Yes Yes
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

details

Phenom II X4 965  vs
FX 4130 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 4 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nms 32 nms
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.07 GHz 4.54 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.14 GHz 4.53 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.07 GHz 4.54 GHz

power consumption

TDP 140W 125W
Annual home energy cost 54.06 $/year 30.11 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 152.42 $/year 109.5 $/year
Performance per watt 3.28 pt/W 4.71 pt/W
Typical power consumption 152.93W 101.56W
AMD Phenom II X4 965
Report a correction
AMD FX 4130
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus