CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 965 vs 4130

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

Cinebench R11.5, Cinebench R10 32-bit, Passmark, GeekBench (32-bit) and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

Cinebench R11.5 (1-core), Cinebench R10 32-bit (1-core) and 1 more

Overclocking

How much speed can you get out of the processor?

Unlocked, Maximum Overclocked Clock Speed (Air) and 2 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Performance Per Dollar

CPUBoss Score

Performance, Single-core Performance, Overclocking and Value

Winner
AMD Phenom II X4 965 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Phenom II X4 965  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Phenom II X4 965

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of AMD Phenom II X4 965

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Phenom II X4 965

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II X4 965

Report a correction
Much lower idle power consumption 89.7W vs 95W More than 5% lower idle power consumption
Lower peak power consumption 174W vs 198W More than 10% lower peak power consumption
Better PassMark score 5,916 vs 4,193 More than 40% better PassMark score
Lower annual commercial energy cost 152.42 $/year vs 173.45 $/year More than 10% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 54.06 $/year vs 59.66 $/year Around 10% lower annual home energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 4130

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 4130

Report a correction
Newer manufacturing process 32 nms vs 45 nms A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 3.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz More than 10% higher clock speed
More l3 cache 8 MB vs 6 MB Around 35% more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
Significantly better performance per dollar 5.72 pt/$ vs 2.98 pt/$ More than 90% better performance per dollar
Significantly more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More l3 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1.5 MB/core Around 35% more l3 cache per core
Marginally newer Feb, 2012 vs Nov, 2009 Release date over 2 years later
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.66 GHz vs 4.06 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better geekbench (64-bit) score 8,216 vs 6,536 More than 25% better geekbench (64-bit) score
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.02 GHz vs 4.14 GHz More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom II X4 965 vs FX 4130

GeekBench (32-bit)

3D Mark 11 (Physics)

Benchmark Results: The 3DMark 2006 CPU test showed the AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE was a powerful processor as it was again near the top of the charts.
Phenom II X4 965 | by Legit Reviews (Aug, 2009)

Cinebench R11.5 (Single Core)

Passmark

Phenom II X4 965 FX 4130 @ cpubenchmark.net

Passmark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Phenom II X4 965  vs
FX 4130 
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 3.8 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
AM3
AM3+
Is unlocked Yes Yes
Is hyperthreaded No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has vitualization support Yes Yes
Instruction-set-extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE4.2
SSE3
SSE2
Supplemental SSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4
SSE4a
AES
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

gpu

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 2,000 MHz 2,600 MHz

details

Phenom II X4 965  vs
FX 4130 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 8 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 2 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nms 32 nms
Transistor count 758,000,000 1,600,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.43V 0.81 - 1.41V
Operating temperature Unknown - 62°C Unknown - 61.1°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 22 11
Overclock review score 5 0.7
Overclocked clock speed 4.06 GHz 4.66 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.14 GHz 5.02 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.06 GHz 4.66 GHz

power consumption

TDP 140W 125W
Annual home energy cost 54.06 $/year 59.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 152.42 $/year 173.45 $/year
Performance per watt 3.43 pt/W 2.8 pt/W
Idle power consumption 89.7W 95W
Peak power consumption 174W 198W
Typical power consumption 152.93W N/A
AMD Phenom II X4 965
Report a correction
AMD FX 4130
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus