Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Phenom II X4 965

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II X4 965

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Is unlocked Yes vs No Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
Much better PassMark (Single core) score 1,361 vs 790 More than 70% better PassMark (Single core) score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.05 GHz vs 2.85 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 6x more l3 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.22 GHz vs 2.2 GHz More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD A6 3620

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 3620

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 152.93W 2.9x lower typical power consumption
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 1.94 pt/W vs 1.08 pt/W Around 80% better performance per watt
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 70.5 °C vs 62 °C Around 15% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 54.06 $/year 3.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 152.42 $/year 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Dec, 2011 vs Nov, 2009 Release date over 2 years later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom II X4 965 vs A6 3620

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Phenom II X4 965
137,800 MB/s
A6 3620
94,100 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Phenom II X4 965  vs
A6 3620 
Clock speed 3.4 GHz 2.5 GHz
Turbo clock speed 0 GHz 2.5 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked Yes No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 140W 65W
Annual home energy cost 54.06 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 152.42 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 1.08 pt/W 1.94 pt/W
Typical power consumption 152.93W 52.81W

details

Phenom II X4 965  vs
A6 3620 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 758,000,000 1,178,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.85 - 1.43V 0.45 - 1.41V
Operating temperature Unknown - 62°C Unknown - 70.5°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.05 GHz 2.85 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.22 GHz 2.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.05 GHz 2.85 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6530D
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 443 MHz
AMD Phenom II X4 965
Report a correction
AMD A6 3620
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus