Winner
AMD Phenom II X4 945 95W
CPUBoss recommends the AMD Phenom II X4 945 95W based on its .
See full details AMD Phenom II X4 945 95W vs X2 565 |
VS
Released December, 2010
AMD Phenom II X2 565
- 3.4 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
1.6 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the X2 565
 | Is unlocked Yes |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 945 95W vs 565 among desktop CPUs (over 75W)
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 2.2 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Phenom II X4 945 95W vs the Phenom II X2 565. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom II X4 945 95W vs X2 565
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Phenom II X4 945 95W | vs | X2 565 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM3 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 95W | 80W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 39.31 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 108.62 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.57 pt/W | 1.12 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 109.72W | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 2,000 MHz | 2,000 MHz | |
details | Phenom II X4 945 95W | vs | X2 565 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.4V | 0.78 - 1.43V | |
| Operating temperature | 55 - 70°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.68 GHz | 4.16 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.81 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.68 GHz | 4.16 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 AMD Phenom II X4 945 95W  Report a correction |  AMD Phenom II X2 565 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 945 95W vs 640 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $95 | ||
| 945 95W vs 955 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $100 | ||
| 945 95W vs 6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| 945 95W vs 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 945 95W vs 945 125W | ||
| | VS |  |
| 945 95W vs 250 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $100 | ||
| 945 95W vs 4100 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9420 | ||
