AMD Phenom II X4 910e vs FX 8350 |
Released January, 2010
AMD Phenom II X4 910e
- 2.6 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD Phenom II X4 910e
 | Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W | | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 71 °C |
| | Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year | | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year |
VS
Released October, 2012
AMD FX 8350
- 4 GHz
- Octa core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the FX 8350
| | Much higher clock speed 4 GHz | | Is unlocked Yes |
| | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.69 GHz | | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 159.66W | 3x lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 71 °C | vs | 61 °C | More than 15% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 56.1 $/year | 3.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 159.62 $/year | 2.8x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 55% higher clock speed | |||
| Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.69 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | More than 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 8.79 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | Around 3.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2012 | vs | Jan, 2010 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom II X4 910e vs FX 8350
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
Cinebench R11.5
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Phenom II X4 910e | vs | FX 8350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Octa core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM3 | |||
| AM3+ | |||
| Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| AVX 1.1 | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| XOP | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| ABM | |||
| BMI1 | |||
| CLMUL | |||
| AMD64 | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| FMA3 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| CVT16 | |||
| AMD-V | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| TBM | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 125W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 56.1 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 159.62 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.99 pt/W | 5.72 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 159.66W | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 2,000 MHz | 2,600 MHz | |
details | Phenom II X4 910e | vs | FX 8350 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.25V | 0.81 - 1.45V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 71°C | Unknown - 61°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 4.69 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.6 GHz | 8.79 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.6 GHz | 4.69 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 AMD Phenom II X4 910e  Report a correction |  AMD FX 8350 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $128 | $264 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i7 3770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $180 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs 8370 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $350 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i7 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $100 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs 6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $250 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i5 6600K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $190 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs Intel Core i5 4460 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $128 | $230 | |
| AMD FX 8350 vs 9590 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS | |
| $248 | $230 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
| | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||
