Winner
AMD Phenom II X4 910e
CPUBoss recommends the AMD Phenom II X4 910e based on its .
See full details AMD Phenom II X4 910e vs Athlon II X4 610e |
Released January, 2010
AMD Phenom II X4 910e
- 2.6 GHz
- Quad core
3.7 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD Phenom II X4 910e
 | Much more l3 cache 6 MB | | Much more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core |
| | Higher clock speed 2.6 GHz |
VS
Released May, 2010
AMD Athlon II X4 610e
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
3.9 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Athlon II X4 610e
| | Significantly lower typical power consumption 36.56W | | Higher Maximum operating temperature 72 °C |
| | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 10.84 $/year | | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 39.42 $/year |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 910e vs 610e among desktop CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Fire Strike | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 3.9 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
AMD Phenom II X4 910eCPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l3 cache | 6 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 12x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 0.13 MB/core | 12x more l3 cache per core | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2.6 GHz | vs | 2.4 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 52.81W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Higher Maximum operating temperature | 72 °C | vs | 71 °C | Almost the same | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 15.66 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 56.94 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom II X4 910e vs Athlon II X4 610e
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Phenom II X4 910e | vs | Athlon II X4 610e |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| AM3 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 65W | 45W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 1.99 pt/W | 2.63 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 52.81W | 36.56W | |
details | Phenom II X4 910e | vs | Athlon II X4 610e |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 0.13 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 0.85 - 1.25V | 0.78 - 1.25V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 71°C | Unknown - 72°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 2,000 MHz | 2,000 MHz | |
 AMD Phenom II X4 910e  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon II X4 610e Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $154 | ||
| 610e vs 250 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $154 | ||
| 610e vs 605e | ||
| | VS |  |
| $154 | ||
| 610e vs 640 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $154 | $125 | |
| 610e vs 3220 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $73 | ||
| 910e vs 910 | ||
| | VS | |
| $73 | ||
| 910e vs 605e | ||
| | VS |  |
| $73 | $75 | |
| 910e vs 740 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
