0 Comments
| AMD Phenom II X4 910 vs A10 5700 |
VS
Released October, 2012
AMD A10 5700
- 3.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the A10 5700
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.4 GHz | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Phenom II X4 910 vs the A10 5700. | |||||||
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 77.19W | More than 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.17 GHz | vs | 3.66 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.4 GHz | vs | 2.6 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | More than 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Newer | Oct, 2012 | vs | Feb, 2009 | Release date over 3 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom II X4 910 vs A10 5700
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Phenom II X4 910
4,814
A10 5700
5,277
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Phenom II X4 910
1,356
A10 5700
1,911
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Phenom II X4 910
104,700 MB/s
A10 5700
2,190,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Phenom II X4 910
4,418
A10 5700
5,135
GeekBench
Phenom II X4 910
4,900
A10 5700
5,583
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Phenom II X4 910
3,268
A10 5700
4,200
PassMark (Single Core)
Phenom II X4 910
909
A10 5700
1,359
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Phenom II X4 910 | vs | A10 5700 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
AVX 1.1 | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
XOP | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
CLMUL | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
3DNow! | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 95W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 22.89 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 83.22 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.38 pt/W | 7.78 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 77.19W | 52.81W |
details | Phenom II X4 910 | vs | A10 5700 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 4 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 0.88 - 1.43V | 0.82 - 1.48V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 71°C | Unknown - 71.3°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.66 GHz | 4.17 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.66 GHz | 4.17 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Radeon™ HD 7660D | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 760 MHz |
AMD Phenom II X4 910 ![]() | AMD A10 5700 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$264 | $140 | |
3770K vs 5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $140 | |
3220 vs 5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$152 | $140 | |
3330 vs 5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$99 | $140 | |
5500 vs 5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$85 | $140 | |
5800K vs 5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | $140 | |
3470 vs 5700 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $140 | |
6700K vs 5700 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||