CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 810 vs 7600 among desktop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Fire Strike

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Fire Strike, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.9

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD A8 7600 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A8 7600  based on its overclocking.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Phenom II X4 810

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II X4 810

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Phenom II X4 810 vs the A8 7600.

Front view of AMD A8 7600

Reasons to consider the
AMD A8 7600

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly higher clock speed 3.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 28 nm vs 45 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 77.19W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.99 GHz vs 3.59 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.81 GHz vs 2.6 GHz More than 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jul, 2014 vs Feb, 2009 Release date over 5 years later
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom II X4 810 vs A8 7600

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Phenom II X4 810
104,800 MB/s
A8 7600
1,970,000 MB/s

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

A8 7600
13,324

Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Reviews Word on the street

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Phenom II X4 810  vs
A8 7600 
Clock speed 2.6 GHz 3.1 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
AMD-V
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM

power consumption

TDP 95W 65W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 1.36 pt/W 8.09 pt/W
Typical power consumption 77.19W 52.81W

details

Phenom II X4 810  vs
A8 7600 
L2 cache 2 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 28 nm
Operating temperature Unknown - 71°C Unknown - 71.3°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.59 GHz 3.99 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.6 GHz 3.81 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.59 GHz 3.99 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ R7
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 720 MHz
AMD Phenom II X4 810
Report a correction
AMD A8 7600
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus