0 Comments
| AMD Phenom II X3 705e vs FX 4100 |
Released June, 2009
AMD Phenom II X3 705e
- 2.5 GHz
- Tri core
Reasons to buy the AMD Phenom II X3 705e
![]() | Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year | ![]() | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year |
![]() | Higher Maximum operating temperature 72 °C |
VS
Released October, 2011
AMD FX 4100
- 3.6 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the FX 4100
![]() | Much more l2 cache 4 MB | ![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.6 GHz |
![]() | Is unlocked Yes | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 34.18 $/year | 2.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 114.41 $/year | 2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Higher Maximum operating temperature | 72 °C | vs | 70.5 °C | Almost the same | |||
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 4 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
Much higher clock speed | 3.6 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | Around 45% higher clock speed | |||
Is unlocked | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; An unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 45 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.17 MB/core | More than 6x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.66 GHz | vs | 3.57 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.99 GHz | vs | 2.5 GHz | Around 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Newer | Oct, 2011 | vs | Jun, 2009 | Release date over 2 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Phenom II X3 705e vs FX 4100
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Phenom II X3 705e
3,181
FX 4100
5,176
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Phenom II X3 705e
1,290
FX 4100
1,827
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Phenom II X3 705e
99.6 MB/s
FX 4100
2,150,000 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Phenom II X3 705e
3,971
FX 4100
4,993
GeekBench
Phenom II X3 705e
3,971
FX 4100
6,919
Cinebench R11.5
Phenom II X3 705e
2.25
FX 4100
2.96
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Phenom II X3 705e
2,244
FX 4100
4,051
PassMark (Single Core)
FX 4100
1,221
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Phenom II X3 705e | vs | FX 4100 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Cores | Tri core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
AM3 | |||
AM3+ | |||
Is unlocked | No | Yes | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
XOP | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
ABM | |||
CLMUL | |||
AMD64 | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
FMA4 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
CVT16 | |||
AMD-V | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 65W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | 34.18 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | 114.41 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 1.15 pt/W | 6.46 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 52.81W | N/A | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 2,000 MHz | 3,200 MHz |
details | Phenom II X3 705e | vs | FX 4100 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 3 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.17 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | |
L3 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 45 nm | 32 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 0.8 - 1.25V | 1.14 - 1.55V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72°C | Unknown - 70.5°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.57 GHz | 4.66 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.5 GHz | 4.99 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.57 GHz | 4.66 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
AMD Phenom II X3 705e ![]() | AMD FX 4100 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $180 | |
4100 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $100 | |
4100 vs 6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $80 | |
4100 vs 4300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $95 | |
4100 vs 955 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $200 | |
4100 vs 965 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | $125 | |
4100 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$100 | ||
4100 vs 640 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||