CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 8439 SE vs 2350 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Opteron 8439 SE 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Opteron 8439 SE  based on its performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 8439 SE

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 8439 SE

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 3 MB vs 2 MB 50% more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l3 cache 6 MB vs 2 MB 3x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 6 vs 4 2 more cores; run more applications at once
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.1 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 2 6 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More threads 6 vs 4 2 more threads
More l3 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l3 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Jul, 2009 vs Sep, 2007 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of AMD Opteron 2350

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 2350

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 60.94W vs 85.31W Around 30% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year vs 91.98 $/year Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year vs 25.29 $/year Around 30% lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 8439 SE vs 2350

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 8439 SE  vs
2350 
Clock speed 2.8 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Hexa core Quad core
Socket type
F
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 105W 75W
Annual home energy cost 25.29 $/year 18.07 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 91.98 $/year 65.7 $/year
Performance per watt 2.23 pt/W 1.54 pt/W
Typical power consumption 85.31W 60.94W

bus

Clock speed 2,200 MHz 1,000 MHz

details

Opteron 8439 SE  vs
2350 
Threads 6 4
L2 cache 3 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 2 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 8 2
Clock multiplier 14 10
Voltage range 1 - UnknownV 1 - UnknownV
Operating temperature 0 - 55°C 0 - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.1 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.1 GHz 2 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Opteron 8439 SE
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 2350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus