AMD Opteron 8393 SE vs 2389 |
Released April, 2009
AMD Opteron 8393 SE
- 3.1 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 8393 SE
 | Significantly higher clock speed 3.1 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.66 GHz |
| | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 | | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.1 GHz |
VS
Released February, 2009
AMD Opteron 2389
- 2.9 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the 2389
| | Significantly lower typical power consumption 60.94W | | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year |
| | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.66 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 2 | 6 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.9 GHz | More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 60.94W | vs | 85.31W | Around 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 65.7 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 18.07 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | Around 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Opteron 8393 SE vs 2389
clock speed
L2 cache
L3 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Opteron 8393 SE | vs | 2389 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| F | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 105W | 75W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 25.29 $/year | 18.07 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 91.98 $/year | 65.7 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 85.31W | 60.94W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | HyperTransport 3.0 | HyperTransport 3.0 | |
| Clock speed | 2,200 MHz | 2,200 MHz | |
details | Opteron 8393 SE | vs | 2389 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 8 | 2 | |
| Clock multiplier | 15 | 14 | |
| Voltage range | 1.32 - UnknownV | 1.32 - UnknownV | |
| Operating temperature | 0 - 55°C | 0 - 55°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.66 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.66 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 AMD Opteron 8393 SE  Report a correction |  AMD Opteron 2389 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||
