Winner
AMD Opteron 2384
CPUBoss recommends the AMD Opteron 2384 based on its cost to run.
See full details AMD Opteron 8393 SE vs 2384 |
Released April, 2009
AMD Opteron 8393 SE
- 3.1 GHz
- Quad core
5.2 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the AMD Opteron 8393 SE
 | Much higher clock speed 3.1 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.66 GHz |
| | Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.1 GHz |
VS
Released November, 2008
AMD Opteron 2384
- 2.7 GHz
- Quad core
5.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the 2384
| | Significantly lower typical power consumption 60.94W | | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year |
| | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 8393 SE vs 2384 among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
| 5.2 | CPUBoss Score |
Combination of all six facets | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.66 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | 8 | vs | 2 | 6 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | vs | 2.7 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 60.94W | vs | 85.31W | Around 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 65.7 $/year | vs | 91.98 $/year | Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 18.07 $/year | vs | 25.29 $/year | Around 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 8393 SE vs 2384
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Opteron 8393 SE | vs | 2384 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| F | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 105W | 75W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 25.29 $/year | 18.07 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 91.98 $/year | 65.7 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 2.04 pt/W | 2.12 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 85.31W | 60.94W | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 2,200 MHz | 2,200 MHz | |
details | Opteron 8393 SE | vs | 2384 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 45 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 8 | 2 | |
| Clock multiplier | 15 | 13 | |
| Voltage range | 1.32 - UnknownV | 1.3 - UnknownV | |
| Operating temperature | 0 - 55°C | 0 - 55°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.66 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.1 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.66 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 AMD Opteron 8393 SE  Report a correction |  AMD Opteron 2384 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $969 | ||
| E5450 vs 2384 | ||
 | VS | |
| $168 | ||
| 3570 vs 2384 | ||
 | VS | |
| $187 | ||
| 2300 vs 2384 | ||
 | VS | |
| $279 | ||
| E5620 vs 2384 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $205 | ||
| 2400 vs 8393 SE | ||
 | VS | |
| 8439 SE vs 8393 SE | ||
 | VS | |
| $128 | ||
| 8350 vs 8393 SE | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
