CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 8389 vs 8384 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.1

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD Opteron 8389 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD Opteron 8389  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 8389

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 8389

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.9 GHz vs 2.7 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.9 GHz vs 2.7 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.9 GHz vs 2.7 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Opteron 8384

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 8384

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 8384 vs the 8389.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Opteron 8389 vs 8384

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 8389
6,762
Opteron 8384
24,266

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Opteron 8389
115,200 MB/s
Opteron 8384
161.4 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 8389  vs
8384 
Clock speed 2.9 GHz 2.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core
Socket type
F
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 75W 75W
Annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year 18.07 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year 65.7 $/year
Performance per watt 2.2 pt/W 3.66 pt/W
Typical power consumption 60.94W 60.94W

bus

Clock speed 2,200 MHz 2,200 MHz

details

Opteron 8389  vs
8384 
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 6 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 8 8
Clock multiplier 14 13
Voltage range 1.32 - UnknownV 1.3 - UnknownV
Operating temperature 0 - 55°C 0 - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.9 GHz 2.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.9 GHz 2.7 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.9 GHz 2.7 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Opteron 8389
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 8384
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus