Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 8384

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 8384

Report a correction
Much more l3 cache 6 MB vs 1 MB 6x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 5% higher clock speed
Much more l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 3x more l3 cache per core
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Lower typical power consumption 60.94W vs 77.19W More than 20% lower typical power consumption
Newer Nov, 2008 vs Aug, 2006 Release date over 2 years later
Lower annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 20% lower annual home energy cost
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD Opteron 8218

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 8218

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.91 GHz vs 2.7 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Features Key features of the Opteron 8384  vs 8218 

clock speed

Opteron 8384
2.7 GHz
Opteron 8218
2.6 GHz

L2 cache

L3 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Opteron 8384
2.7 GHz
Opteron 8218
2.91 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Opteron 8384
2.7 GHz
Opteron 8218
2.6 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 8384  vs
8218 
Clock speed 2.7 GHz 2.6 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core
Socket type
F
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 75W 95W
Annual home energy cost 18.07 $/year 22.89 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 65.7 $/year 83.22 $/year
Typical power consumption 60.94W 77.19W

details

Opteron 8384  vs
8218 
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 cache 6 MB 1 MB
L3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 8 8
Operating temperature 0 - 55°C 0 - 55°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.7 GHz 2.91 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.7 GHz 2.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.7 GHz 2.91 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
AMD Opteron 8384
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 8218
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus