Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of AMD Opteron 8214

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 8214

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 8 vs 1 7 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Front view of AMD A10 5700

Reasons to consider the
AMD A10 5700

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 4 MB vs 2 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Significantly higher clock speed 3.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 55% higher clock speed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 77.19W More than 30% lower typical power consumption
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.17 GHz vs 2.74 GHz More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Aug, 2006 Release date over 6 years later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 71.3 °C vs 55 °C Around 30% higher Maximum operating temperature
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 22.89 $/year More than 30% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 83.22 $/year More than 30% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Opteron 8214  vs A10 5700 

clock speed

Opteron 8214
2.2 GHz
A10 5700
3.4 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Opteron 8214
2.74 GHz
A10 5700
4.17 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Opteron 8214
2.2 GHz
A10 5700
3.4 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Opteron 8214  vs
A10 5700 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 3.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
SSE3
SSE
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
3DNow!
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 95W 65W
Annual home energy cost 22.89 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 83.22 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 77.19W 52.81W

details

Opteron 8214  vs
A10 5700 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 8 1
Voltage range 1.3 - UnknownV 0.82 - 1.48V
Operating temperature 0 - 55°C Unknown - 71.3°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.74 GHz 4.17 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.2 GHz 3.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.74 GHz 4.17 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 7660D
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 760 MHz
AMD Opteron 8214
Report a correction
AMD A10 5700
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus